Intracranial pressure measurement

Describe the measurement of intracranial pressure

Accurate measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP) is fundamental in neurocritical care, allowing early detection of intracranial hypertension and guiding therapy.

Several monitoring modalities are available, broadly divided into:

  • ventricular systems (external ventricular drains)
  • intraparenchymal devices (fibreoptic and strain-gauge monitors)

Each technique differs in:

  • accuracy and calibration
  • ability to provide therapeutic intervention (CSF drainage)
  • susceptibility to error and complications

Understanding these differences is essential to selecting the appropriate monitor and interpreting ICP values correctly in clinical practice.

ICP measurement devices

External ventricular drain (EVD)

Feature

External ventricular drain (EVD)

Components

  • Ventricular catheter
  • Fluid-filled non-compressible tubing
  • External transducer (Wheatstone bridge)
  • Processor / monitor
  • Drainage chamber

Mechanism

Ventricular pressure is transmitted via a fluid column to an external transducer, where it is converted into an electrical signal and displayed as ICP waveform and value.

Benefits

  • Gold standard
  • Measures ventricular (global) ICP
  • Can be re-zeroed
  • Diagnostic (CSF sampling)
  • Therapeutic (CSF drainage)
  • Relatively inexpensive

Limitations

  • Requires expertise
  • Invasive
  • Risk of infection and haemorrhage
  • Difficult with small ventricles
  • Can block
  • Risk of over-drainage

Sources of error

Patient:

  • Movement
  • Coughing
  • Shivering
  • Seizures
  • Catheter blockage (clot/debris)

Operator:

  • Incorrect levelling
  • Incorrect zeroing
  • Incorrect placement
  • Incorrect drain height

Environment:

  • Electrical interference
  • Tubing movement
  • Air bubbles in system

Machine:

  • Transducer calibration error
  • Damping / resonance
  • Monitor malfunction

Intraparenchymal ICP monitors

Feature

Fibreoptic ICP monitor
(e.g. Camino®)

Strain-gauge ICP monitor
(e.g. Codman®)

Components

  • Pressure-sensitive diaphragm
  • Fibreoptic cable
  • Processor / monitor
  • Tip-mounted strain gauge sensor
  • Electrical cable
  • Processor / monitor

Mechanism

  • Pressure deforms diaphragm
  • Alters reflected light signal
  • Converted to ICP waveform
  • Pressure deforms strain gauge
  • Alters electrical resistance
  • Converted to ICP waveform

Benefits

  • Easier and faster to insert than EVD
  • Less invasive (no ventricular cannulation)
  • Can be placed intraparenchymal, subdural or epidural
  • Continuous ICP waveform
  • Not prone to blockage
  • Useful when ventricles are small or inaccessible
  • Lower infection risk than EVD

Limitations

  • Expensive
  • Measures local parenchymal pressure
  • Cannot drain CSF
  • Cannot sample CSF
  • Cannot be re-zeroed after insertion
  • Calibration drift (notably after ~72 h)
  • Small risk of haemorrhage and infection

Sources of error

Patient:

  • Movement
  • Coughing
  • Shivering
  • Seizures
  • Local pressure gradients around sensor tip

Operator:

  • Incorrect placement
  • Poor fixation
  • Sensor or cable damage during insertion

Environment:

  • Electrical interference
  • Cable kinking or tension
  • Temperature-related signal variation

Machine:

  • Calibration drift
  • Baseline drift
  • Signal processing error
  • Monitor malfunction

Interpreting the ICP waveform

Each cardiac cycle produces three peaks:

  • P1 (percussion wave)

    • Represents arterial pulsation transmitted from the choroid plexus
    • Normally the highest peak
    • Reflects arterial pressure
  • P2 (tidal wave)

    • Reflects intracranial compliance
    • Sensitive to changes in intracranial volume buffering
    • Normally lower than P1
  • P3 (dicrotic wave)

    • Corresponds to aortic valve closure
    • Smallest peak

Normal waveform

  • P1 > P2 > P3
  • Indicates normal intracranial compliance
  • Arterial pulsations are effectively buffered by:
    • CSF displacement
    • Venous outflow

Raised ICP / reduced compliance

  • P2 increases and may exceed P1
  • Indicates reduced intracranial compliance and hence progression toward the decompensated (steep) part of the pressure–volume curve

Other waveform changes:

  • Increased overall amplitude of the entire waveform
  • Rounded / broadened peaks
  • Reduced distinction between P1, P2 and P3

ICP waveform

Variation in the ICP waveform with normal or raised pressures

By Harary et al. Intracranial Pressure Monitoring—Review and Avenues for Development.